Posted by Melvin Jones on February 4th, 2007
The Right Reverend Jamal-Harrison Bryant, who, for the sake of brevity, I shall refer to as Mister Twister, broadcast one of his sermons a couple of weeks ago. The sermon was entitled “Better Late Than Never.”
Before I go on, let me point out that Mister Twister said some things that are certainly true. He said some things that no one in their right mind would ignore. However, having said that, Mister Twister also did great violence to Scripture.
Here’s a test for you. Read some of the statements Mister Twister makes about a portion of Scripture. It’s a parable. Read the statements and see if, based on those statements, you can identify the parable. We’ll do the same thing in another posting with a hatchet job he did on a character from the Old Testament. I’ll relate some of his statements and you tell me who he’s talking about.
The first one to come up with the correct answer will get an all expense paid trip to Charm City, an over night stay at one of Baltimore’s finest hotels, and a limousine ride to the Sunday service at Empowerment Temple. We’ll even give you a $20 bill to throw on the steps of the podium while Mister Twister is preaching.
Anyway, here’s what he said:
You have to have what I call anointed arrogance. You can understand who you are when you understand whose you are.
The church is nothing more than an orphanage , God says “When your family gave up on you I’ll take you!”
You have to understand that you won’t be delivered until you have faith enough to go back to the place where you almost died; until you can face the same people who left your for dead.
The son is going back to his father’s house, the place where he ran from; the place he didn’t like; the place that caused pain. He had to go back in order to be healed.
The dad just didn’t understand that the son just wanted his approval and affection
The father improved while the son was gone
When the son left, the father just threw money at him
The son woke up in a pig’s pen and said “I deserve better than this.”
How would the prodigal son’ story have been different if the father had affirmed him before he left?
And to this last question I ask: How would the sermon have been different if Mister Twister had actually dealt with the text and its intent?
Those of you who guessed that this was a sermon loosely based on the Prodigal Son, you are correct.
Take a minute, go read the parable of the Prodigal Son. In fact, read not only the parable of the PS, but the others that were included in the series. I have the chapter shown below. It’s in Luke 15:1-24. And it says:
Luke 15:1-24 (NASB)
1 Now all the tax collectors and the sinners were coming near Him to listen to Him. 2 Both the Pharisees and the scribes began to grumble, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them.” 3
So He told them this parable, saying, 4 “What man among you, if he has a hundred sheep and has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the open pasture and go after the one which is lost until he finds it? 5 “When he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 “And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’ 7 “I tell you that in the same way, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.
8 “Or what woman, if she has ten silver coins and loses one coin, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and search carefully until she finds it? 9 “When she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin which I had lost!’ 10 “In the same way, I tell you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” 11
And He said, “A man had two sons. 12 “The younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of the estate that falls to me.’ So he divided his wealth between them. 13 “And not many days later, the younger son gathered everything together and went on a journey into a distant country, and there he squandered his estate with loose living. 14 “Now when he had spent everything, a severe famine occurred in that country, and he began to be impoverished. 15 “So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that country, and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. 16 “And he would have gladly filled his stomach with the pods that the swine were eating, and no one was giving anything to him. 17 “But when he came to his senses, he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired men have more than enough bread, but I am dying here with hunger! 18 ‘I will get up and go to my father, and will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in your sight; 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me as one of your hired men.” ‘ 20 “So he got up and came to his father. But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion for him, and ran and embraced him and kissed him. 21 “And the son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and in your sight; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’ 22 “But the father said to his slaves, ‘Quickly bring out the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet; 23 and bring the fattened calf, kill it, and let us eat and celebrate; 24 for this son of mine was dead and has come to life again; he was lost and has been found.’ And they began to celebrate.
Do any of you really think any of these parables has anything to do with father/son relationships? Or do you in fact see that the son is likened to Israel and the father to God? Or at a minimum, it’s talking about the willingness of God to forgive the sinner and restore him.
You have to work real hard to pour any of what Mister Twister says into the passage.
My point here is not that men should not establish a strong relationship with their children. And certainly I would agree that we should always encourage our sons and affirm them whenever possible. But to reduce this parable to nothing more than a lesson in father-son relationships strips it of most, if not all of its real mean and application, and yes - power.
Mister Twister has the son saying “I deserve better than this (living worse than the pigs he had to feed.) The parable shows the son saying “My father’s servants eat better than me. I will go to my father and ask if I can be one of his servants” This is anything but anointed arrogance. It is the humility God demands of us and that we can’t help but show if we understand who God is and what He has graciously done for us.
When the son gets back, he doesn’t claim the privileges of his sonship. Rather, he humbles himself and offers to be his father’s servant.
If indeed the father represents God in this story, how in the world does the father have room to improve? And what, in the text of the section of scripture implies that the father simply threw money at a son he didn’t care about?
Notice what the father in the parable does , he sees the son from afar and RUNS to him. He doesn’t stand there, arms crossed, tapping his foot and scowling as the son approaches. He runs to his son and hugs him.
According to Mister Twister, the father improved. In fact, it was apparently the father’s fault that the whoremongering little twit ran away to begin with. When the boy left, all the dad did was throw money after him. He didn’t seem to care that the boy was leaving. And he left without being affirmed.
Here’s my question: If Mister Twister can’t get something as simple as the parable of the prodigal son right, why should I expect him to get anything else right? Why should I expect him to be able to counsel me, or the poor souls stuck there at ET, from Scripture?
On the other hand, if he doesn’t believe any of what he said (I truly don’t think anyone could be that ignorant), then it would seem that he really has no integrity and will say whatever HE thinks people want to hear.
This man should be given a wide berth. Unfortunately, he’s allowed to broadcast inside Jessup (a prison near Baltimore , You HLOTS people should know this).
Mister Twister really must think his audience is too stupid to read their Bibles. Oh wait , apparently they are too stupid to read their Bible.
Any of you people who attend ET, explain to me how your boy got this hog swill out of the parable. I will post what you have to say without commenting on it before it’s posted. I am really interested in how you can sit under this clown and what machinations you use to stay there.
One thing though - when you answer, don’t tell me about the truth of the need for fathers to relate to their sons. No one is arguing that. I want you to tell me how he got the stuff he preached on out of the parable.
I can’t wait to hear your responses.
Jamal-Harrison Bryant | 220 Comments »