<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To the Rescue!</title>
	<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue</link>
	<description>Speaking plainly about the pimpery in the pulpits.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AngieB</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44301</link>
		<dc:creator>AngieB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44301</guid>
		<description>Brenda,
Thank you sis for the words of encouragement, it was greatly appreciated.  I love this site as well, it has played a very intricate role in my development as a sound Christian.

Peace and Blessings
Angela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenda,<br />
Thank you sis for the words of encouragement, it was greatly appreciated.  I love this site as well, it has played a very intricate role in my development as a sound Christian.</p>
<p>Peace and Blessings<br />
Angela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44221</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44221</guid>
		<description>http://www.11alive.com/video/player.aspx?aid=78553&#38;bw=

Juanita Bynum news interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.11alive.com/video/player.aspx?aid=78553&amp;bw=" rel="nofollow">http://www.11alive.com/video/player.aspx?aid=78553&amp;bw=</a></p>
<p>Juanita Bynum news interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44129</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44129</guid>
		<description>Angie...
Be encouraged. I came out from under the WOF a couple of years ago and had and have many of your same  questions. Just know your not alone. You'll find on this site the awesome willingness those here have to share. I don't comment alot because and viewing, writing notes and checking scriputure...smiles

But just wanted to add my 2cents when and where I can. So again be encouraged!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie&#8230;<br />
Be encouraged. I came out from under the WOF a couple of years ago and had and have many of your same  questions. Just know your not alone. You&#8217;ll find on this site the awesome willingness those here have to share. I don&#8217;t comment alot because and viewing, writing notes and checking scriputure&#8230;smiles</p>
<p>But just wanted to add my 2cents when and where I can. So again be encouraged!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double-G (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44059</link>
		<dc:creator>Double-G (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44059</guid>
		<description>Mav,

Man, Wish you could stay, for it's already feeling a bit less bright without ya, Sis. Then again, "there's a time for everything"...... (Ecclesiastes 3:1)

Enjoy the new season Gods' given you (and prayerfully it'll be brief, lol lol). Much love...&#38; thanks for always having my back, Sis. PEACE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mav,</p>
<p>Man, Wish you could stay, for it&#8217;s already feeling a bit less bright without ya, Sis. Then again, &#8220;there&#8217;s a time for everything&#8221;&#8230;&#8230; (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Ecclesiastes+3%3A1" title="English Standard Version Bible">Ecclesiastes 3:1</a>)</p>
<p>Enjoy the new season Gods&#8217; given you (and prayerfully it&#8217;ll be brief, lol lol). Much love&#8230;&amp; thanks for always having my back, Sis. PEACE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryV</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44053</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44053</guid>
		<description>No one Nigel............no one :lol: (sorry, I couldn't resist. You knows I luv ya!!)

Angela, my wife is from Brooklyn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one Nigel&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;no one <img src='http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> (sorry, I couldn&#8217;t resist. You knows I luv ya!!)</p>
<p>Angela, my wife is from Brooklyn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44021</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-44021</guid>
		<description>Hey Mrs Mav,

All the best with the homeschool. BTW who is going to enjoy my humour now? No fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mrs Mav,</p>
<p>All the best with the homeschool. BTW who is going to enjoy my humour now? No fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReformedCushite</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43980</link>
		<dc:creator>ReformedCushite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43980</guid>
		<description>You Bro' (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Bro&#8217; (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prisca</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43974</link>
		<dc:creator>Prisca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43974</guid>
		<description>@Mrs. Mav....

May our God bless your hands, Sister!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mrs. Mav&#8230;.</p>
<p>May our God bless your hands, Sister!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43965</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43965</guid>
		<description>Ah, You can give a quick post once and a while.  You just have to squeeze 5 min. of your time to say a quick hello.  BTW, I admire you for homeschooling.

Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, You can give a quick post once and a while.  You just have to squeeze 5 min. of your time to say a quick hello.  BTW, I admire you for homeschooling.</p>
<p>Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela trent</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43958</link>
		<dc:creator>angela trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43958</guid>
		<description>Ms Maverick,
What school do you teach and what borough? I am a native New Yorker too though I was born and live here in NC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms Maverick,<br />
What school do you teach and what borough? I am a native New Yorker too though I was born and live here in NC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryV</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43947</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43947</guid>
		<description>NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! You can't stop by just to keep your toe in the water?? C'mon!!! We need our Mav.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! You can&#8217;t stop by just to keep your toe in the water?? C&#8217;mon!!! We need our Mav&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrs. maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43921</link>
		<dc:creator>mrs. maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43921</guid>
		<description>oops, forgot nigel lol. toodles, nige. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, forgot nigel lol. toodles, nige. <img src='http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrs. maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43920</link>
		<dc:creator>mrs. maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43920</guid>
		<description>hi paisano!!!, and gg, and kylesy, and gridikins, and sis. b-pearl, and righter ( i know you're lurking out there somewhere), and bro. ld the hops, and cop, and jog, and righteous robin,and deb, and all my namesakes, the angelas that frequent this site,and prisca, and bt, and jcrep, and ic, and the 2 guys that wrote that infamous paper and last but not least, our very own benevolent dictator melville! 
mrs. mav is going to be missing in action for a bit 'cause school starts tomorrow here in nyc and  i'm homeschooling my 4 children which takes up ALOT of my time. i'll miss the laughter, the playful banter, and debates. remember me in your prayers family- i love you all in Christ!
blessings&#38; peace 2 u all. (warm smile)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi paisano!!!, and gg, and kylesy, and gridikins, and sis. b-pearl, and righter ( i know you&#8217;re lurking out there somewhere), and bro. ld the hops, and cop, and jog, and righteous robin,and deb, and all my namesakes, the angelas that frequent this site,and prisca, and bt, and jcrep, and ic, and the 2 guys that wrote that infamous paper and last but not least, our very own benevolent dictator melville!<br />
mrs. mav is going to be missing in action for a bit &#8217;cause school starts tomorrow here in nyc and  i&#8217;m homeschooling my 4 children which takes up ALOT of my time. i&#8217;ll miss the laughter, the playful banter, and debates. remember me in your prayers family- i love you all in Christ!<br />
blessings&amp; peace 2 u all. (warm smile)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double-G (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43897</link>
		<dc:creator>Double-G (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43897</guid>
		<description>(SIS MAV: hi lil bruh, yes, i got your e-mails and you favor your father so much. i'll get back to you on that)

WHERE MY EMAIL AT, GURL?!!!! (lol, lol, lol) Seriously, just wondering if you forgot or have  simply been too busy......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(SIS MAV: hi lil bruh, yes, i got your e-mails and you favor your father so much. i&#8217;ll get back to you on that)</p>
<p>WHERE MY EMAIL AT, GURL?!!!! (lol, lol, lol) Seriously, just wondering if you forgot or have  simply been too busy&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double-G (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43896</link>
		<dc:creator>Double-G (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43896</guid>
		<description>(MN: Again, I am not saying "disregard everything SG teaches." I am, however, saying that you should not expect me to recommend an SG church or an SG site for information.)

Fair enough, Brah....... though please know that I was never trying to ACCUSE you of anything or MAKE YOU IMPLY ANYTHING you didn't mean. Just trying to make sure I heard you right, Brah.

Thanks for clarifying, though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(MN: Again, I am not saying &#8220;disregard everything SG teaches.&#8221; I am, however, saying that you should not expect me to recommend an SG church or an SG site for information.)</p>
<p>Fair enough, Brah&#8230;&#8230;. though please know that I was never trying to ACCUSE you of anything or MAKE YOU IMPLY ANYTHING you didn&#8217;t mean. Just trying to make sure I heard you right, Brah.</p>
<p>Thanks for clarifying, though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43878</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43878</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  I hold a view because I think it is accurate.  If someone else holds a view that I believe to be contradictory to mine, then I view the other viewpoint as inaccurate.  If it is inaccurate, it is not worthwhile.  

However, in this discussion, you are trying to make me say that I will discount everything (that I can only learn from those holding the same interpretations as you) another says simply because we disagree on specific issues.  I'm not saying that.  

I am, however, saying that I am not going to look to one who holds a Pentecostal view for on anything approaching a regular basis.  Why should I?  I have said often that I don't hold to the "get rid of the gristle and keep the meat" philosophy of being taught (the gristle being teachings against the basics of Christianity.  And teaching that there is ongoing revelation is against the basics of Christianity.  

Please stop trying to make me imply things I am not implying.  I believe I have fairly clearly stated that I would not recommend an SG site, not when there are such places as Monergism.com.  I would not recommend that a person attend an SG church, not when there are other churches around.  

Is an SG church the equivalent of a subsidiary of Creflo Dollar's church?  No (even though you keep trying to accuse me of saying that).  But I am saying that it is one end of a spectrum of Pentecostal behavior and doctrine.  Like Calvary Chapel, they insist on the absolute authority of Scripture while promoting doctrines that deny it.  

Sharing ideas does not automatically give us a FULLER UNDERSTANDING of what the BIBLE TEACHES.  Studying the Bible and depending on God for illumination does that, Word of Wisdom, Word of Knowledge, or Prophecy as the Pentecostals define them, not withstanding.  

Again, I am not saying "disregard everything SG teaches. "  I am, however, saying that you should not expect me to recommend an SG church or an SG site for information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  I hold a view because I think it is accurate.  If someone else holds a view that I believe to be contradictory to mine, then I view the other viewpoint as inaccurate.  If it is inaccurate, it is not worthwhile.  </p>
<p>However, in this discussion, you are trying to make me say that I will discount everything (that I can only learn from those holding the same interpretations as you) another says simply because we disagree on specific issues.  I&#8217;m not saying that.  </p>
<p>I am, however, saying that I am not going to look to one who holds a Pentecostal view for on anything approaching a regular basis.  Why should I?  I have said often that I don&#8217;t hold to the &#8220;get rid of the gristle and keep the meat&#8221; philosophy of being taught (the gristle being teachings against the basics of Christianity.  And teaching that there is ongoing revelation is against the basics of Christianity.  </p>
<p>Please stop trying to make me imply things I am not implying.  I believe I have fairly clearly stated that I would not recommend an SG site, not when there are such places as Monergism.com.  I would not recommend that a person attend an SG church, not when there are other churches around.  </p>
<p>Is an SG church the equivalent of a subsidiary of Creflo Dollar&#8217;s church?  No (even though you keep trying to accuse me of saying that).  But I am saying that it is one end of a spectrum of Pentecostal behavior and doctrine.  Like Calvary Chapel, they insist on the absolute authority of Scripture while promoting doctrines that deny it.  </p>
<p>Sharing ideas does not automatically give us a FULLER UNDERSTANDING of what the BIBLE TEACHES.  Studying the Bible and depending on God for illumination does that, Word of Wisdom, Word of Knowledge, or Prophecy as the Pentecostals define them, not withstanding.  </p>
<p>Again, I am not saying &#8220;disregard everything SG teaches. &#8221;  I am, however, saying that you should not expect me to recommend an SG church or an SG site for information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GxG (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43873</link>
		<dc:creator>GxG (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43873</guid>
		<description>Brah, 

To clarify, 

Are you basically saying YOUR theological viewpoints (or those whom agree with you) are the ONLY WORTHWILE &#38; ACCURATE ones-----? &#38; that you can only learn from those holding the same interpretations as you?

Moreover, you're implying disregard EVERYTHING SG teaches, even when it affirms SOUND GODLY PRINCIPLES or the CENTRALITY OF CHRIST? Or that it's wrong to recommend ANY RESOURCES by SG, even when agreeing with your viewpoints?

Also, do you believe that through the sharing of ideas we can come to a FULLER UNDERSTANDING of what the BIBLE TEACHES?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brah, </p>
<p>To clarify, </p>
<p>Are you basically saying YOUR theological viewpoints (or those whom agree with you) are the ONLY WORTHWILE &amp; ACCURATE ones&#8212;&#8211;? &amp; that you can only learn from those holding the same interpretations as you?</p>
<p>Moreover, you&#8217;re implying disregard EVERYTHING SG teaches, even when it affirms SOUND GODLY PRINCIPLES or the CENTRALITY OF CHRIST? Or that it&#8217;s wrong to recommend ANY RESOURCES by SG, even when agreeing with your viewpoints?</p>
<p>Also, do you believe that through the sharing of ideas we can come to a FULLER UNDERSTANDING of what the BIBLE TEACHES?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDub (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43842</link>
		<dc:creator>GDub (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 05:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43842</guid>
		<description>By the way, Bro GaryV, you're still gonna need to appoint a new "RIKI TIKI" for yourself if you take over......or at least consider trying  something new like having TRIPLE Bodyguards (lol, lol, lol). 

IMO, IC/Bro Lawerence D &#38; Kyle would be the best choice......&#38; perhaps even Sis MAV, if she's ferocious enough (Lol)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Bro GaryV, you&#8217;re still gonna need to appoint a new &#8220;RIKI TIKI&#8221; for yourself if you take over&#8230;&#8230;or at least consider trying  something new like having TRIPLE Bodyguards (lol, lol, lol). </p>
<p>IMO, IC/Bro Lawerence D &amp; Kyle would be the best choice&#8230;&#8230;&amp; perhaps even Sis MAV, if she&#8217;s ferocious enough (Lol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GxG (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43826</link>
		<dc:creator>GxG (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43826</guid>
		<description>(MN: I suspect they are NOT pimps, but again, they do promote prophecy, tongues, 
and the rest of the rest of the activities that eventually made the environment 
ripe for the pimps.)

      Sorry, but The activities are not THE SOURCE FOR PIMPS THRIVING. Obviously, Pimps use them......but since when did that make the activities bad in/of 
themselves? 

     Is Money INHERENTLY EVIL Because I encountered a COUNTERFEIT  Bill, or 
witnessed another person EMBEZZLING IT?

Of course not, and to say  promoting it is ALWAYS DANGEROUS DUE TO  INSTANCES OF ABUSE/DECEPTION is ILLOGICAL, for THAT'S IGNORING THE FACT THAT THERE's GOOD TO COME FROM IT WHEN USED PROPERLY......&#38; likewise,  the 
Abuse of SPIRITUAL GIFTS doesn't necessitate NEEDING TO AVOID THEM.  &lt;strong&gt;(MN:&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;em&gt;However, I would argue that there is no proper use of the gift of Prophecy as the Pentecostals define and practice it.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;

As Scripture makes clear, they're beneficial ONLY WHEN PROPERLY  USED TO HELP THE 
CHURCH (I Corinthians 12-14)......which Sovereign Grace does CONSISTENTLY to my knowledge.

.
Also, PIMPS THRIVED EVEN WHEN THESE ACTIVITIES were NON=EXISTENT. Consider the time before the REFORMATION, where  PIMPS IN THE CATHOLIC AREANA STILL thrived by manipulating other legitimate things we have no problem with, such as  the Concept of Tradition in Scripture ( http://www.carm.org/catholic/tradition.htm ).  


Pimps don't thrive because of GOD'S GIFTS, but because of DECEPTION (Matthew 24:9-14), PEOPLE NOT DESIRING THE TRUTH ( II Thessalonians 2:1-12, I Timothy 4:1-5, II Timothy 3:1-9, II Timothy 4:1-5),  &#38; the simple fact that GOD ALLOWS IT IN ORDER TO highlight those who're TRULY GENUINE BELIEVERS (I Corinthians 11:19). &lt;strong&gt; (MN: &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Who said they thrive because of God's gifts?  I say they thrive because the standards have been erased.  Pentecostalism was instrumental in eroding and erasing those standards. &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;

Bottom line: PIMPS WILL CONTINUE TO thrive REGARDLESS of circumstances till CHRIST RETURNS (Matthew 7:14-20, Revelation 18-22)   

(MN: They themselves identify themselves as Pentecostal....)

NOT ALL CHARISMATICS or PENTECOSTALS BELIEVE THE SAME. There are SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS ( http://www.isitso.org/guide/pentchar.html ,  
http://www.mb-soft.com/believe/text/charisma.htm , ), ....&#38; not all practice 
spiritual gifts ABUSIVELY AS THE WOF PIMPS do (  http://faith.propadeutic.com/ ).  (MN:  No one said they did.)

Please don't generalize, sir.
&lt;strong&gt;
(MN:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; Here, let me be specific.

All Pentecostals believe in an additional work of the Spirit that gives those who receive it a closer relationship with Jesus Christ.  And in having this experience, you then have access to your gifts.  So does SG.  

All Pentecostals believe that men still speak as those moved by the Holy Spirit, giving new revelation.  So does SG.  

All Pentecostals believe that Tongues is a private prayer language and should be used publicly or semi publicly in a group of believers.  So does SG.

All Pentecostals believe that God still speaks directly to us through prophecy.  So does SG. 

I have not said every one abuses these activities.  I have said they are not consistent with what the Bible says and the place of authority the Bible is to have in our lives.  I have also said that Pentecostal practices inevitably lead to a weakening of the foundation of the Christian faith - the Bible. 

It also (starting with Azusa Street, moving to the various morphings of the practices, from the crazies at Azusa, to the Bennetts and their group, to the Charismatic catholics, to the wholesale infection of the rest of mainstream) weakened the foundation of absolute Biblical authority and replaced it with a combination of Bible and experience.  Now, the Pentecostals, in whatever denomination or environment they are in, interpret scripture according to their experience.  Look, for example, at what they do with 1 Corinthian  12 through 14.  They create a private prayer language where Scripture says no such thing.  They either practice Tongues and Interpretations where there are no unbleivers (Calvary Chapel), or in the opposite direction hold services where everyone is running around like mad men, babbling at the top of the lungs.  And of course there is everything in between.  

That has, over the last 100 years, been the greatest aid to the pimps who, almost without exception promote a Pentecostal, experience-based theology.  We could start with Parham, move to A. A. Allen, Oral Roberts, W. R. Schambach, Ken Hagin, Ken Copeland, Fred Price, and the current crop of young pimps infesting the Body.  

They all had their start in Pentecostalism.  Organizations like SG and Calvary Chapel simply represent an effort to drag Pentecostal practices back to some semblance of being rational.  And while I commend them for this, ultimately it's a useless exercise.  

Your reference to counterfeit money, though interesting, is invalid.  It assumes that there are valid occurrences of prophesies today and that there is a valid experience called the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.  I and many other, are saying that it is not a matter of being able to tell a valid experience from a counterfeit one.  There is no valid one.  It is similar to saying I should be able to tell a counterfeit three dollar bill from a real one.  No.  They are all counterfeit because there is no such thing as a three dollar bill. 

Again, I'll work with them.  But I would not recommend them to anyone. &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(MN: I suspect they are NOT pimps, but again, they do promote prophecy, tongues,<br />
and the rest of the rest of the activities that eventually made the environment<br />
ripe for the pimps.)</p>
<p>      Sorry, but The activities are not THE SOURCE FOR PIMPS THRIVING. Obviously, Pimps use them&#8230;&#8230;but since when did that make the activities bad in/of<br />
themselves? </p>
<p>     Is Money INHERENTLY EVIL Because I encountered a COUNTERFEIT  Bill, or<br />
witnessed another person EMBEZZLING IT?</p>
<p>Of course not, and to say  promoting it is ALWAYS DANGEROUS DUE TO  INSTANCES OF ABUSE/DECEPTION is ILLOGICAL, for THAT&#8217;S IGNORING THE FACT THAT THERE&#8217;s GOOD TO COME FROM IT WHEN USED PROPERLY&#8230;&#8230;&amp; likewise,  the<br />
Abuse of SPIRITUAL GIFTS doesn&#8217;t necessitate NEEDING TO AVOID THEM.  <strong>(MN:</strong>  <em>However, I would argue that there is no proper use of the gift of Prophecy as the Pentecostals define and practice it.</em> <strong>)</strong></p>
<p>As Scripture makes clear, they&#8217;re beneficial ONLY WHEN PROPERLY  USED TO HELP THE<br />
CHURCH (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=I+Corinthians+12-14" title="English Standard Version Bible">I Corinthians 12-14</a>)&#8230;&#8230;which Sovereign Grace does CONSISTENTLY to my knowledge.</p>
<p>.<br />
Also, PIMPS THRIVED EVEN WHEN THESE ACTIVITIES were NON=EXISTENT. Consider the time before the REFORMATION, where  PIMPS IN THE CATHOLIC AREANA STILL thrived by manipulating other legitimate things we have no problem with, such as  the Concept of Tradition in Scripture ( <a href="http://www.carm.org/catholic/tradition.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.carm.org/catholic/tradition.htm</a> ).  </p>
<p>Pimps don&#8217;t thrive because of GOD&#8217;S GIFTS, but because of DECEPTION (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Matthew+24%3A9-14" title="English Standard Version Bible">Matthew 24:9-14</a>), PEOPLE NOT DESIRING THE TRUTH ( <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=II+Thessalonians+2%3A1-12" title="English Standard Version Bible">II Thessalonians 2:1-12</a>, <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=I+Timothy+4%3A1-5" title="English Standard Version Bible">I Timothy 4:1-5</a>, <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=II+Timothy+3%3A1-9" title="English Standard Version Bible">II Timothy 3:1-9</a>, <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=II+Timothy+4%3A1-5" title="English Standard Version Bible">II Timothy 4:1-5</a>),  &amp; the simple fact that GOD ALLOWS IT IN ORDER TO highlight those who&#8217;re TRULY GENUINE BELIEVERS (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=I+Corinthians+11%3A19" title="English Standard Version Bible">I Corinthians 11:19</a>). <strong> (MN: </strong> <em>Who said they thrive because of God&#8217;s gifts?  I say they thrive because the standards have been erased.  Pentecostalism was instrumental in eroding and erasing those standards. </em> <strong>)</strong></p>
<p>Bottom line: PIMPS WILL CONTINUE TO thrive REGARDLESS of circumstances till CHRIST RETURNS (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Matthew+7%3A14-20" title="English Standard Version Bible">Matthew 7:14-20</a>, <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Revelation+18-22" title="English Standard Version Bible">Revelation 18-22</a>)   </p>
<p>(MN: They themselves identify themselves as Pentecostal&#8230;.)</p>
<p>NOT ALL CHARISMATICS or PENTECOSTALS BELIEVE THE SAME. There are SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS ( <a href="http://www.isitso.org/guide/pentchar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.isitso.org/guide/pentchar.html</a> ,<br />
<a href="http://www.mb-soft.com/believe/text/charisma.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.mb-soft.com/believe/text/charisma.htm</a> , ), &#8230;.&amp; not all practice<br />
spiritual gifts ABUSIVELY AS THE WOF PIMPS do (  <a href="http://faith.propadeutic.com/" rel="nofollow">http://faith.propadeutic.com/</a> ).  (MN:  No one said they did.)</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t generalize, sir.<br />
<strong><br />
(MN:</strong> <em> Here, let me be specific.</p>
<p>All Pentecostals believe in an additional work of the Spirit that gives those who receive it a closer relationship with Jesus Christ.  And in having this experience, you then have access to your gifts.  So does SG.  </p>
<p>All Pentecostals believe that men still speak as those moved by the Holy Spirit, giving new revelation.  So does SG.  </p>
<p>All Pentecostals believe that Tongues is a private prayer language and should be used publicly or semi publicly in a group of believers.  So does SG.</p>
<p>All Pentecostals believe that God still speaks directly to us through prophecy.  So does SG. </p>
<p>I have not said every one abuses these activities.  I have said they are not consistent with what the Bible says and the place of authority the Bible is to have in our lives.  I have also said that Pentecostal practices inevitably lead to a weakening of the foundation of the Christian faith - the Bible. </p>
<p>It also (starting with Azusa Street, moving to the various morphings of the practices, from the crazies at Azusa, to the Bennetts and their group, to the Charismatic catholics, to the wholesale infection of the rest of mainstream) weakened the foundation of absolute Biblical authority and replaced it with a combination of Bible and experience.  Now, the Pentecostals, in whatever denomination or environment they are in, interpret scripture according to their experience.  Look, for example, at what they do with 1 Corinthian  12 through 14.  They create a private prayer language where Scripture says no such thing.  They either practice Tongues and Interpretations where there are no unbleivers (Calvary Chapel), or in the opposite direction hold services where everyone is running around like mad men, babbling at the top of the lungs.  And of course there is everything in between.  </p>
<p>That has, over the last 100 years, been the greatest aid to the pimps who, almost without exception promote a Pentecostal, experience-based theology.  We could start with Parham, move to A. A. Allen, Oral Roberts, W. R. Schambach, Ken Hagin, Ken Copeland, Fred Price, and the current crop of young pimps infesting the Body.  </p>
<p>They all had their start in Pentecostalism.  Organizations like SG and Calvary Chapel simply represent an effort to drag Pentecostal practices back to some semblance of being rational.  And while I commend them for this, ultimately it&#8217;s a useless exercise.  </p>
<p>Your reference to counterfeit money, though interesting, is invalid.  It assumes that there are valid occurrences of prophesies today and that there is a valid experience called the Baptism of the Holy Spirit.  I and many other, are saying that it is not a matter of being able to tell a valid experience from a counterfeit one.  There is no valid one.  It is similar to saying I should be able to tell a counterfeit three dollar bill from a real one.  No.  They are all counterfeit because there is no such thing as a three dollar bill. </p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;ll work with them.  But I would not recommend them to anyone. </em> <strong>)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GxG (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43823</link>
		<dc:creator>GxG (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43823</guid>
		<description>(MN:  I wouldn't. These guys are Pentecostal....)

Sorry Brah, but I'm gonna have to go with MacArthur on this one. For, he's still 
willing to work with Mahanney/Harris...&#38; he has even recommended their SOLID 
Resources....JUST as Piper, RC Sproul &#38; others have MULTIPLE TIMES for YEARS!!!

For evidence,

http://www.t4g.org/speakers.html

http://www.joshharris.com/stop_dating_the_church.php

 
&lt;a href="http://www.reformation21.org/Reformation_21_Blog/Reformation_21_Blog/58/vobId__617/"&gt;Reformation 21&lt;/a&gt;

 
http://www.alliancenet.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID307086&#124;CHID559376
&#124;CIID2023144,00.html


IT'S ILLOGICAL CLAIMING ONE  CANNOT LEARN FROM OR ASSOCIATE with Believers holding 
DIFFERING interpretations ------For what's ESSENTIAL is THE CENTRALITY OF THE 
GOSPEL OF CHRIST....

IMO,  SOMETHING'S HIGHLY OFF when we're willing to DIVIDE OVER NON-ESSENTIAL 
issues rather than UNITING FOR THE SAKE OF SPREADING THE GOSPEL.....for not all 
Followers will resemble each other or belong to the SAME GROUPS. People who are on Jesus' side have the SAME GOAL of BUILDING UP THE KINGDOM of GOD, &#38; THEY 
SHOULD NOT LET THEIR DIFFERENCES INTERFERE WITH THIS GOAL (  I Corinthians 12, 
Ephesians 4:1-16). 

If someone shares common faith in Christ, THEY SHOULD be  
COOPERATED WITH, as the Word says (Mark 9:38-41)

&lt;strong&gt;(MN:&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;em&gt;I don't care what John MacArthur does.  While I can work with them, I have no intention of recommending them.  Their belief in extra-biblical revelation is a non-starter for me.  Extrabiblical revelation (i.e. Adam was six feet 5 inches tall, blond and blue-eyed)  ends up impacting the essentials sooner or later.  Each of us has our set of &lt;a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tripwire"&gt;trip-wires&lt;/a&gt;.  Extra-biblical revelations is one of mine.  I don't expect you all to have the same ones as me.  But neither am I going to change mine based on the reputation of a theologian, no matter how much I admire and respect that theologian.  I wanted to be Charles Stanley when I grew up.  But I still think he is wrong to promote tithing.    
  
If MacArthur is working with folks who hold to new revelation, then he is going against the very things he writes about in "The Charismatics."  That's his problem.  Not mine.  

Tell me, would you think it would have been alright to work with Montanus? In the beginning, when he first started the pentecostal stuff, he was pretty orthodox.  The church didn't think so.  The reason?  He held to extrabiblical revelation.  He held to several other beliefs as well, but foremost among them was the idea of extrabiblical revelation and a couple of other "eccentricities."  

I would reject your reference to Mark since there is no indication that the people doing the exorcisms taught anything contrary to sound doctrine. 

SG's Pentecostal stand is going to, somewhere down the road, result in them either being forced to reject it, or a turn from orthodoxy in other areas.  Their willingness to "waterdown" their previously clear Pentecostal stand is, to me, an indication that they recognize that there is a conflict between what the Bible says and what they do.  As more people who reject the pentecostal slant come into the organization, I suspect they will be pressured into dropping it all together.  &lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;)&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(MN:  I wouldn&#8217;t. These guys are Pentecostal&#8230;.)</p>
<p>Sorry Brah, but I&#8217;m gonna have to go with MacArthur on this one. For, he&#8217;s still<br />
willing to work with Mahanney/Harris&#8230;&amp; he has even recommended their SOLID<br />
Resources&#8230;.JUST as Piper, RC Sproul &amp; others have MULTIPLE TIMES for YEARS!!!</p>
<p>For evidence,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.t4g.org/speakers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.t4g.org/speakers.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.joshharris.com/stop_dating_the_church.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.joshharris.com/stop_dating_the_church.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reformation21.org/Reformation_21_Blog/Reformation_21_Blog/58/vobId__617/">Reformation 21</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.alliancenet.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID307086" rel="nofollow">http://www.alliancenet.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID307086</a>|CHID559376<br />
|CIID2023144,00.html</p>
<p>IT&#8217;S ILLOGICAL CLAIMING ONE  CANNOT LEARN FROM OR ASSOCIATE with Believers holding<br />
DIFFERING interpretations &#8212;&#8212;For what&#8217;s ESSENTIAL is THE CENTRALITY OF THE<br />
GOSPEL OF CHRIST&#8230;.</p>
<p>IMO,  SOMETHING&#8217;S HIGHLY OFF when we&#8217;re willing to DIVIDE OVER NON-ESSENTIAL<br />
issues rather than UNITING FOR THE SAKE OF SPREADING THE GOSPEL&#8230;..for not all<br />
Followers will resemble each other or belong to the SAME GROUPS. People who are on Jesus&#8217; side have the SAME GOAL of BUILDING UP THE KINGDOM of GOD, &amp; THEY<br />
SHOULD NOT LET THEIR DIFFERENCES INTERFERE WITH THIS GOAL (  <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=I+Corinthians+12" title="English Standard Version Bible">I Corinthians 12</a>,<br />
<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Ephesians+4%3A1-16" title="English Standard Version Bible">Ephesians 4:1-16</a>). </p>
<p>If someone shares common faith in Christ, THEY SHOULD be<br />
COOPERATED WITH, as the Word says (<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Mark+9%3A38-41" title="English Standard Version Bible">Mark 9:38-41</a>)</p>
<p><strong>(MN:</strong>  <em>I don&#8217;t care what John MacArthur does.  While I can work with them, I have no intention of recommending them.  Their belief in extra-biblical revelation is a non-starter for me.  Extrabiblical revelation (i.e. Adam was six feet 5 inches tall, blond and blue-eyed)  ends up impacting the essentials sooner or later.  Each of us has our set of <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tripwire">trip-wires</a>.  Extra-biblical revelations is one of mine.  I don&#8217;t expect you all to have the same ones as me.  But neither am I going to change mine based on the reputation of a theologian, no matter how much I admire and respect that theologian.  I wanted to be Charles Stanley when I grew up.  But I still think he is wrong to promote tithing.    </p>
<p>If MacArthur is working with folks who hold to new revelation, then he is going against the very things he writes about in &#8220;The Charismatics.&#8221;  That&#8217;s his problem.  Not mine.  </p>
<p>Tell me, would you think it would have been alright to work with Montanus? In the beginning, when he first started the pentecostal stuff, he was pretty orthodox.  The church didn&#8217;t think so.  The reason?  He held to extrabiblical revelation.  He held to several other beliefs as well, but foremost among them was the idea of extrabiblical revelation and a couple of other &#8220;eccentricities.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I would reject your reference to Mark since there is no indication that the people doing the exorcisms taught anything contrary to sound doctrine. </p>
<p>SG&#8217;s Pentecostal stand is going to, somewhere down the road, result in them either being forced to reject it, or a turn from orthodoxy in other areas.  Their willingness to &#8220;waterdown&#8221; their previously clear Pentecostal stand is, to me, an indication that they recognize that there is a conflict between what the Bible says and what they do.  As more people who reject the pentecostal slant come into the organization, I suspect they will be pressured into dropping it all together.  </em> <strong>)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GxG (G²)</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43819</link>
		<dc:creator>GxG (G²)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43819</guid>
		<description>(GaryV: Not a fair test for employment for me DG.............you know whitey got no rhythm.)

And that one came STAIGHT from the pit (lol, lol, lol).....but please don't tell me you've bought the "Black People ONLY have RHYTHM" lie, Brah. If so, it's all good, cause NOT ALL BLACKS HAVE IT EITHER (wink)....

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(GaryV: Not a fair test for employment for me DG&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.you know whitey got no rhythm.)</p>
<p>And that one came STAIGHT from the pit (lol, lol, lol)&#8230;..but please don&#8217;t tell me you&#8217;ve bought the &#8220;Black People ONLY have RHYTHM&#8221; lie, Brah. If so, it&#8217;s all good, cause NOT ALL BLACKS HAVE IT EITHER (wink)&#8230;.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryV</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43816</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43816</guid>
		<description>OK cool............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK cool&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43792</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43792</guid>
		<description>This may be somewhat off topic but at the risk of earning the ire of our BD I plunge ahead. The word of God speaks about not forsaking the assembling of ourselves. (He 10:25) But there are not many other if any instances of this in other parts of the NT. Yes I agree Paul did write to different gatherings but my appreciation or understanding was that the focus was more on life living than assembling. 

On the other hand the Word of God is replete with instruction and direction regarding the way we ought to live our lives as Christians. Ro 6:12-15, Ga 5:16-26, Eph 4:17-32. And I can go on and on. My point is the focus seems to be on assembling for assembling sake as opposed to assembling to help guide us in our life living. At times there are those who would attempt to make one feel guilty for not assembling. A lot of focus would be placed on the form and not the substance so to speak. Thereby having descended into a form of Godliness some have no purpose for assembling and thus do not truly give heed to what is being fed to them, resulting in accepting whatever is placed before them by apostate preachers and heretical ministers.

Funnily enough it is only very recently (thanks to PP) something registered on my consciousness. Many times we quote 2 Ti 2:15 to remind persons about the fact that they should be delving into the Word of God for themselves but I read some things I have read over and over before but didn't really pay attention. Many times Christ prefaced what he was saying with "have ye not read" Mt 12:3, 12:5, 19:4, 22:31; Mar 12:10, 12:26. This says to me that it is expected that we should be reading scripture in order that we understand what is expected of us as believers.

Just some of my thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be somewhat off topic but at the risk of earning the ire of our BD I plunge ahead. The word of God speaks about not forsaking the assembling of ourselves. (He 10:25) But there are not many other if any instances of this in other parts of the NT. Yes I agree Paul did write to different gatherings but my appreciation or understanding was that the focus was more on life living than assembling. </p>
<p>On the other hand the Word of God is replete with instruction and direction regarding the way we ought to live our lives as Christians. Ro 6:12-15, Ga 5:16-26, <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Eph+4%3A17-32" title="English Standard Version Bible">Eph 4:17-32</a>. And I can go on and on. My point is the focus seems to be on assembling for assembling sake as opposed to assembling to help guide us in our life living. At times there are those who would attempt to make one feel guilty for not assembling. A lot of focus would be placed on the form and not the substance so to speak. Thereby having descended into a form of Godliness some have no purpose for assembling and thus do not truly give heed to what is being fed to them, resulting in accepting whatever is placed before them by apostate preachers and heretical ministers.</p>
<p>Funnily enough it is only very recently (thanks to PP) something registered on my consciousness. Many times we quote 2 Ti 2:15 to remind persons about the fact that they should be delving into the Word of God for themselves but I read some things I have read over and over before but didn&#8217;t really pay attention. Many times Christ prefaced what he was saying with &#8220;have ye not read&#8221; Mt 12:3, 12:5, 19:4, 22:31; Mar 12:10, 12:26. This says to me that it is expected that we should be reading scripture in order that we understand what is expected of us as believers.</p>
<p>Just some of my thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angieb</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43790</link>
		<dc:creator>Angieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43790</guid>
		<description>Thanks GaryV,

You answered my question with great specificity (if that us such a word)..LOL

Peace and Blessings
Angela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks GaryV,</p>
<p>You answered my question with great specificity (if that us such a word)..LOL</p>
<p>Peace and Blessings<br />
Angela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaryV</title>
		<link>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43789</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pulpit-pimps.org/archives/2007/08/28/to-the-rescue#comment-43789</guid>
		<description>HI MAV!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI MAV!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
