(MN: Well of course that’s the only reason people from FBCG(otK) come to the site. That’s why I made FBCGlenarden.com one of the routers. I’m fully aware that few of the people at FBCG(otK) think deeply enough to visit the site on purpose. For instance, your knee-jerk reaction in saying that I am simply a pimp without a pulpit is a perfect example of that. How, exactly, do I pimp the people who visit here? John K. Jenkins has gotten literally millions of hard earned dollars out of you people. Your hard work, like the prostitute’s hard work, has enabled John K. Jenkins to live a very wealthy lifestyle. Let’s see - getting rich at the hos’ expense - trying to warn the hos about their pimp. Let’s see, which is the the pimp? Which one more closely matches Matthew 10:24 - 28? )

I would like to see your response to my question. (MN: But if this your last time visiting the site, how will you be able to see my response? ) But I can’t say nor express how much First Baptist Church of Glenarden has done for my life and also my family’s life. I would be writing forever. But as a young college student, in which Pastor Jenkins and the church has helped to pay for, I will take up for my pastor. It is something I feel that Obama should have done for his, especially after he attended his church for about 20 years. (MN: Unfortunately, paying for schooling for you is not one of the activities a pastor is called to do. Does expound the word accurately? Not usually. Does he feed the flock rather than his own ego? Not usually. Does he protect the sheep from wolves like Charles Ellis, T. Dexter Jakes and others? No. Instead, he brings them into the church to feast on the sheeple. )

I just wanted to know if you feel that this is your calling by God, to point out false prophets on an internet site which does not get much publicity to begin with in the first place? I heard about it throuh a girl who I believe knows your son but otherwise I would have never came across it. (MN: Which son? ) I think I can speak for everyone when I say that some pastors come off as suspicious in what their doctrine and how they handle the money. (MN: Why in the world do you think you can speak for everyone? You certainly can’t speak for me. ) Yet they are still bringing souls to Christ, and if you are a Christian, then you should know that you are turning people away.

This site questioning bishops and pastors only gives people a false pretense of what christianity is all about and instead of trying to turn people away from these so-called “Pulpit-Pimps”, why don’t you try getting a license to preach? Why don’t you build a congregation through whatever doctrine you believe to be right by God? And if you are doing the right thing, then God will deliver his people. (MN: Not everyone is a preacher. Besides, I’m not sure why you think no one reads the site. Didin’t you see the recent posting from someone who claims to the a child of Donnie Hilliard up in New Jersey? )

Again I am not judging you as this site does these pastors and bishops. I am just questioning your motives, your purpose, and your actions. (MN: Then you ARE judging. ) I actually agree with you that there might be some shady ministers out there, but it is not my place to judge them. (MN: It IS your place to judge them. If not you, then who? ) I’ll let God be the judge, and their followers if in their word, should be able to see for themselves. (MN: It’s your job to judge. And if you were better traiined by your pastor you would know that. Instead, he has trained you so badly that he can do anything without fear of being called to account by you. Instead, you will continue to give your money to him, paying no attention to what he does with it, and expect God to keep tabs on it. )

In all I feel that Pastor John K Jenkins is a wonderful minister and that he should not be acknowledged as a Pulpit-Pimp. (MN: Lots of people FEEL lots of things. The prostitute FEELS her pimp is looking out for her. The abused child FEELS his abuser is all he has. Never mind what you feel What does the Bible say. Oh wait - you probably don’t know what the Bible says. After all, that would require study on your own. And that’s not some John K. Jenkins really encourages. )

The people that attend First Baptist Church of Glenarden attend under their own will. (MN: So is the prostitute. But until someone convinces her it worth leaving, she stays. But you still try to talk to her, to make sure she knows why she should leave. Same with the ‘hos at FBCG(otK). )

So if you feel that people are being tricked or exploited then why don’t you start a church where they won’t? Not on the internet bashing ministers which does not lead by example, especially since not everyone has the internet and if so this site is not known to be very popular. But by humbly and respectfully starting your own ministry. If you lead correctly then the right people will follow. (MN: The “right” people? Who are the right people? )

(MN: AMDM, I’m really not understanding why you keep trying to make me say more about the catechism than I said. I fact, specifically, I said: “Now, on the other side, if I have any problem with the Presbyterians, it’s the fact that they may rely a little too much on the catechism.” Defining basic doctrine is the purpose of a catechism. Obviously you don’t want to use a catechism that differes drastically from your position. Scientology has a catechism. Catholocism has catechism. The Unity School of Christianit has a catechism. Surely you understand that I am not saying pick a catechism and work with it. Heck, push come to shove, you can create your OWN catechism. The bottom line is that it is far more effective to TEACH YOUR CHILDREN [which I believe was the initial reason this even showed up] using discrete doctrinal knowledge. But I can guarantee you someone is going to disagree with whatever you put in your catechism. )

It is simply a guide through Scripture in a format which allows a structured method of imparting elementary Biblical truth. Is it perfect?? Nope……….because it’s not inspired. Is it useful?? Yup. So, what’s your problem??

The frightening thing is that it appears to be coming from the recent contributors from FBCG. Frightening because it may be indicative of the type of behaviour which occurs at the church. Please put your egos and feelings secondary and try to understand what takes place on this site, try to separate truth from falsehood, fact from fiction and God’s word from man’s utterances.

“Feed the flock, not on the flock.”

Not all believers are ignorant of scripture sir.

the Westminster Catechism is not inspired, please note the baptism of baby’s can you find a scripture verse to support it’s teaching.

There was a question that was asked of you earlier by solideogloriafella. Remember?

“Janae,
Would you be able to explain, how you effectively communicate the gospel?”

I understand if you don’t want to answer it, but at least acknowledge it before you request to hear what someone else said. You were also wisely, biblically and needfully addressed by Cheryl concerning some statements you made. Let’s revisit that just in case you forgot:

“Janae-

I would like to bring your attention to II Timothy 3:16-17 “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”

If you feel that someone has misspoken and you want to rebuke, correct, or train - use scripture. We want to be careful that we are not focusing on the teaching of a man, but on the teaching of the Word. I respect my pastor as well as you respect yours, BUT my pastor has told the flock to test everything he says with scripture. “1Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” I John 4:1.

When a pastor sets himself up as “God’s mouthpiece” and you are not question him that is NOT in line with scripture.

Please consider this about a virtuous woman:

“She speaks with wisdom, and faithful instruction is on her tongue.” Proverbs 31:26″

Would you care to respond to these comments first? This reminds me of when I tell my kids to make sure they finish one box of cereal before they open up another one…

By the way Mel I don’t see an answer to my question, you can answer it on my site so as not to lead this site away from it’s purpose.

(Only a few will get the above joke, which isn’t an explicit, or ribald joke…)

*Me too, seeing as how it was laced with petty and gratuitous statements…

I’m sorry, I just had to throw that in.

(MN: Persecution?!?! Please!! Allegedly having your nephew railed on is not persecution. Being accused of being a pimp is not persecution. Beiing threatened for lying and pimping is not persecution. If this fellow exists, he not doing and saying what he is doing because of John’s godliness. He’s doing it because of John’s sleaziness. The saints were - and are - persecuted because they stand for Christ, first and only. John was allegedly threatened because he is perceived to be a pimp. You dishonor the memories of those persecuted by comparing him to them; by comparing any Christian in America to them.

)

(MN: Tell you what amdm, answer these questions in a few words each, and provide Scripture to back them up:

Now, on the other side, if I have any problem with the Presbyterians, it’s the fact that they may rely a little too much on the catechism. )

If I may interject, I believe that solideogloriafella was responding to Janae, asking her to clarify what her idea of the presentation of the gospel is….Ok, back to hibernation and popcorn…

Solus Christus,

R4C

(MN: You are correct - as Solideogloriafella also points out. )